Talcum Powder Sales Shouldn’t Come At The Cost Of Women’s Lives

Screen Shot 2021-01-23 at 8.10.22 PM.png
By Raja Krishnamoorthi and M. Isabelle Chaudry 


Following litigation and a congressional investigation that linked its asbestos-containing talc-based baby powder to cases of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, the pharmaceutical company Johnson & Johnson announced in May that it would discontinue sales of the product in the United States and Canada.

However, in making this historic commitment, Johnson & Johnson also stipulated that all existing inventory still on U.S. shelves would continue to be sold until supplies ran out. This comes as the company has also worked to expand sales of their talc-based baby powder in markets abroad

As a Haitian-American woman and an Indian-American Member of Congress, we write to voice our concerns about the continuing presence of this dangerous product in the U.S. and its expanding presence around the world. 

Given Johnson & Johnson’s interest in expanding their sales in South Africa, Ghana, Kenya, Brazil, Russia, China and India, we are especially concerned with the company’s history of marketing practices that they’ve employed to target their talc-based baby powder products at marginalized communities.  

In the past few decades, Johnson & Johnson has studied cultural norms and found that their talc-based baby powder was especially popular among communities of color, particularly those in hot and humid climates. Baby powder is often used as a deodorant and to help with chafing in adults as well as infants.   

In a 1992 memo released to the public in 2016, Johnson & Johnson executives wrote about investigating “(African-American, Hispanic) opportunities to grow the franchise.” More recently in their 2006 marketing plans, Johnson & Johnson included a focus on “underdeveloped geographical areas with hot weather, and higher AA population,” the “AA” referring to African-Americans. And in 2008 the company sought proposals for an “African-American agency” to develop campaigns “speaking to AA consumers,” which led them to distribute 100,000 gift bags containing product samples in African-American and Hispanic neighborhoods throughout Chicago.  

Such marketing practices targeting marginalized communities in the United States raise serious concerns about Johnson & Johnson’s expansion around the world. As our nation, and our world, come to terms with its history of racial discrimination, we can no longer turn a blind eye to practices that have caused higher concentrations of hazardous materials to proliferate in communities of color. And we must hold companies like Johnson & Johnson to account for continuing to sell a product they already know to be poisonous both here in the United States and across the world. 

That is why we are joining together today to urge Johnson & Johnson to go beyond its recent commitment to stop selling their talc-based baby powder in the U.S. and Canada to aggressively work to remove any remaining inventory from U.S. shelves while also halting all sales of the product globally. We are demanding the company mount a global public-education campaign encouraging consumers to discard their talc-based baby powder products. And we are urging Alex Gorsky and the members of Johnson & Johnson’s Board to sit down with current and future victims across the world. Through open and honest dialogue, we can work to reach a fair and just agreement that not only protects and cares for survivors, but also prevents similar problems from happening again.    

Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL08) serves as Chair of the House Oversight Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy and M. Isabelle Chaudry serves as Senior Policy Manager of the National Women’s Health Network

Previous
Previous

Cosmetics & Personal Care Products and Women’s Health: A Closer Look at Menstruation, Fibroids, Endometriosis, and Reproductive Health

Next
Next

In the Absence of Meaningful Cosmetics Legislation, it’s Best to Avoid Talc